In the Dublin use case, the VaVeL prototype is used to identify automatically incidents in the streets of Dublin, analyzing the available data streams. At the same time, the effectiveness, the efficiency but also the usability and privacy preserving capabilities of the developed framework will be evaluated in a real setting. In this use case VaVeL’s vision is to improve incident detection in the Traffic Control Room of Dublin City Council (DCC).
DCC, Intelligent Transportation System. Dublin City has been developed as one of Europe’s leading smart cities. The Roads and Traffic Department of Dublin City Council operates a ”smart” control center, aggregating live streaming data from sensors located around the greater Dublin city area to manage the City’s road network for the benefit of pedestrians, cyclists, motorists and public service and commercial vehicles. These sensors include:
The department is currently pursuing the following strategic directions: (a) providing alternatives to car commuting, (b) developing, optimizing and maintaining the city’s road network, (c) managing on-street parking, and (d) improving the city’s environment.
The Dublin Use case will study the following types of incidents:
We are going to evaluate the proposed prototype at DCC control room for 6 months. The system will be used and evaluated by DCC operators. A weekly feedback loop will be established from the beginning of the pilot in order for the consortium to provide with a bi-weekly prototype update. A user interface will be established where DCC operators can mark incidents as True Positives (TP) and False Positives (FP). Unidentified events from the system will be marked as False Negatives (FN). The consortium will take advantage of reports provided by the authorities (traffic reports, weather reports). These documents will be exploited as ground truth.
The prototype will be evaluated in terms of the previously defined statistical measures TP, FP and FN. In addition, user satisfaction of DCC operators will be recorded. A clear situation comparison (with vs without VaVeL) will be provided in order to estimate the benefits of the system provided. The performance of the anonymization will be evaluated by labeling the video data. Furthermore, we will show that the video data is still suitable for further analysis. This will be demonstrated by showing that the anonymization step does not negatively impact incident detection algorithms.